1. Family: Fabaceae Lindl.
    1. Daniellia Benn.

      1. This genus is accepted, and its native range is Tropical Africa.

    [FZ]

    Leguminosae, R.K. Brummitt, A.C. Chikuni, J.M. Lock & R.M. Polhill. Flora Zambesiaca 3:2. 2007

    Habit
    Unarmed deciduous or evergreen trees.
    Leaves
    Leaves simply pinnate; petiolules not twisted; leaflets opposite or subopposite, with translucent gland dots; stipules intrapetiolar, connate into a narrowly ovate-ellipsoid structure enfolding the bud, early caducous.
    Inflorescences
    Inflorescence paniculate; flowers spirally arranged; pedicels jointed at base; bracteoles well developed, almost completely concealing the young flower buds, both caducous before anthesis.
    Hypanthium
    Hypanthium elongate.
    Calyx
    Sepals 4, imbricate (2 outer, 2 inner).
    Corolla
    Petals (in the Flora area) 3 large and 2 small.
    Stamens
    Stamens 10, 9 shortly connate at the base.
    Pistil
    Ovary stipitate, the stipe adnate to the hypanthium; style long; stigma small.
    Fruits
    Pods 1-seeded, dehiscing into 2 valves; endocarp coriaceous, curling and separating from the exocarp.
    Seeds
    Seeds solitary, large, with a smooth hard testa, affixed near the distal end of the pod, wind-dispersed attached to the exocarp of one valve of the pod.
    [LOWO]

    Legumes of the World. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. MacKinder & M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. (2005)

    Habit
    Trees
    Ecology
    Tropical rain forest, often in swampy and inundated areas, and 2 spp. in seasonally dry forest, woodland and wooded grassland
    Distribution
    Africa (centred in Guinea-Congolian WC [7 spp.] and W [2 spp.] regions, with 3 spp. extending to the drier Sudanian and Zambezian centres, south to Angola and east to Sudan and Uganda)
    Note
    Placed as basally branching within the Detarieae sens. strict. clade by Bruneau et al. (2001); the fruit is a rare example of a 'hemi-legume'; the seed and endocarp of one valve fall together as a unit; genus currently under revision

    The Detarieae sens. lat. are pantropical in distribution, with c. 58% of the genera confined to Africa (incl. Madagascar), c. 20% to the Neotropics, and c. 12% to tropical Asia. Only Copaifera, Crudia and Cynometra are pantropical (and all possibly non monophyletic) and Afzelia, Guibourtia, Hymenaea, Intsia and Sindora are native to at least two of these regions. The apparent high level of diversity in the African tropics may in part be an artefact of the (relatively) greater taxonomic effort that has been invested in the study of the African taxa. Characteristic of African Detarieae taxonomy has been the splitting off of disparate elements as segregate genera, while this has often not been the case in the Neotropics. Both regions, however, currently contain large paraphyletic assemblages requiring detailed species-level analysis. Eighty-two genera and from (729) – 747 – (765) species are treated here in Detarieae sens. lat. (Fig. 21). Of the 132 (extant) species so far assessed for IUCN red data status, 97 have categories of threat. Of these 73 are assessed as vulnerable, 13 are endangered and 11 are critically endangered.

    The remarkable range and complex patterns of floral modifications found in the Detarieae sens. lat. have proved a considerable challenge to the establishment of widely accepted and clearly circumscribed generic groupings. Based on the work of Léonard (1957) and Cowan & Polhill (1981a & b), ten informal groups of genera were proposed; the Cynometra, Hymenostegia, Hymenaea, Crudia, Detarium and Brownea groups in tribe Detarieae, and the Berlinia, Macrolobium, Amherstia and Brachystegia groups in tribe Amherstieae. Genera with imbricate bracteole aestivation were assigned to Detarieae whilst those with valvate bracteole aestivation were placed in Amherstieae. Polhill (1994) retained these generic groupings with a few additions to accommodate recently described genera, and merged the two tribes into a single broadly defined tribe, Detarieae sens. lat. Breteler (1995) proposed the recognition of two tribes within Detarieae sens. lat., separated according to the relative size and position of the paired bracteoles before anthesis. Essentially, this resulted in the reassignment of Cowan & Polhill’s Amherstia group genera (Amherstia, Tamarindus and Humboldtia) from Amherstieae to Detarieae with the remaining genera forming tribe Macrolobieae. In 1999, Breteler (pers. comm.) proposed a modified Breteler (1995) tribal system in which Macrolobieae was maintained, the circumscription of Detarieae was greatly narrowed and the genera newly excluded from Detarieae were together recognised as Cynometreae sens. strict.

    The first comprehensive studies of phylogenetic relationships in tribe Detarieae sens. lat., were the analyses of Bruneau et al. (2000; 2001), based on nucleotide sequence data from the chloroplast trnL intron. They found that tribes Detarieae and Macrolobieae formed a well supported monophyletic group, which included all genera placed previously in Detarieae sens. lat., except Umtiza. Bruneau et al. (2000) examined 71 genera, with the African taxa most widely sampled. The key results of the analysis were that none of the generic groupings proposed by Cowan and Polhill (1981a & b) and Polhill (1994) were supported as strictly monophyletic, and the majority of the members of tribe Macrolobieae (although not Macrolobium) were placed as a monophyletic group derived within Detarieae sens. lat. These analyses also repeatedly recognised a second group of related genera made up entirely of resin-producing taxa, with the exception of some species of Guibourtia. The resins can be seen as translucent gland dots in the leaflets and (sometimes) other organs. Within the resin producing taxa, the genus Prioria and several members of Cowan & Polhill’s Crudia group were consistently placed together (see taxonomic notes under individual genera in main text). Another subclade within the resin-producing Detarieae comprising six members of Polhill’s Detarium group was repeatedly recognised (Bruneau et al., 2000; 2001; Fougère-Danezan et al., 2003). In addition, in the trnL intron analysis, the five sampled members of Cowan and Polhill’s Brownea group were consistently placed together with Macrolobium, although this grouping was not upheld in a more recent molecular and combined molecular-morphological analysis (Herendeen et al., 2003a). Within the exclusively African Macrolobieae of Bruneau et al. (2001), a well supported subclade of six genera was recognised by Gervais & Bruneau (2002) and as the ‘babjit’ clade sensu Wieringa & Gervais (2003). Bruneau et al. (2000; 2001) confirmed the view of Polhill (1994) that the two tribes Detarieae and Macrolobieae (sensu Breteler, 1995) are best considered a single entity. Evidence from ontogenetic studies by Tucker (2000, 2001, 2002a) challenged the validity of bracteole aestivation as a criterion for subdividing Detarieae sens. lat. and identified a set of character states associated with two modes of floral development (Circular and Omega) whose distribution amongst detarioid genera does not support Polhill’s groups.

    The analyses of Herendeen et al. (2003a) united a morphological dataset with the chloroplast trnL intron dataset of Bruneau et al. (2001). The combined analysis provided mixed results within Detarieae sens. lat. compared with the molecular dataset alone. Near the base of the clade, and within some subclades, greater resolution was provided but as several groups were not well supported, it would be premature to emphasise the details of this greater resolution. Elsewhere the addition of morphological characters produced weaker resolution and a less robust phylogeny due either to conflicting phylogenetic signal or increased homoplasy in the morphological data or both. The order of taxa followed here (Fig. 21) represents a synthesis of the present understanding of putative relationships within this (perhaps most morphologically diverse) tribe in the Leguminosae. Unsampled genera in the combined analysis are inserted into this order where morphological evidence appears to suggest close relationships.

    Whilst significant progress has been made since Polhill (1994), further studies (particularly including the non-African members of the larger and less well understood genera) are needed before a new comprehensive classification of the Detarieae sens. lat., based on a synthesis of all available data, can be established.

    [FTEA]

    Leguminosae, J. B. Gillett, R. M. Polhill & B. Verdcourt. Flora of Tropical East Africa. 1971

    Habit
    Unarmed evergreen or deciduous trees
    Leaves
    Leaves simply paripinnate; stipules intrapetiolar, connate into a structure lanceolate in outline, enfolding the axillary bud, open on the abaxial side, and very soon caducous; petiolules not twisted; leaflets opposite or subopposite, with pellucid gland-dots (sometimes restricted to certain parts of the leaflet, such as near the margins or midrib or base)
    Inflorescences
    Inflorescence paniculate; ultimate branches racemose; flowers spirally arranged; pedicels jointed at base; bracteoles large, well-developed, concavo-convex, ± completely concealing the young flower-buds, one bracteole overlapping the other by its margins, both caducous before the flower opens
    Hypanthium
    Hypanthium elongate
    Calyx
    Sepals 4, imbricate (2 outer, 2 inner)
    Corolla
    Petals either (2–)3 large or medium ± 2(–3) very small, or 1 large or medium ± 4 very small
    Stamens
    Stamens 10, free, or 9 of them shortly connate at base
    Pistil
    Ovary stipitate, the stipe adnate to the hypanthium; style long; stigma small
    Fruits
    Pods dehiscing into 2 valves; endocarp coriaceous, curling up and separating from the stiffly papery to thinly woody exocarp; seeds solitary, large, with smooth hard testa, affixed near the distal end of the pod, dis-persed together with and while still remaining attached to the exocarp of one valve of the pod; funicle rather long, expanded at its end into a small aril.
    [LOWO]
    Use
    Used as timber, e.g., D. oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. & Dalziel (West African copal, gum copal, ogea, faro) for plywood, joinery, furniture components, boxes, crates and decorative veneers; fibre (for paper), copal-resins and gums (used in boat building, preserving railway sleepers, as medicines, glue, varnishes, polishes, cosmetics and for ceremonial purposes), charcoal, reafforestation and as shade trees

    Images

    Distribution

    Native to:

    Angola, Benin, Burkina, Cabinda, Cameroon, Central African Repu, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Gulf of Guinea Is., Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zaïre

    Daniellia Benn. appears in other Kew resources:

    Date Reference Identified As Barcode Type Status
    Keay, R.W.J. [0 s.n001], Cameroon K000181766
    Thomas, D.W. [1125], Cameroon K000092797

    First published in Pharm. J. 14: 251 (1855)

    Accepted by

    • de la Estrella, M., Aedo, C., Mackinder, B. & Velayos, M. (2010). Taxonomic revision of Daniellia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) Systematic Botany 35: 296-324.
    • Govaerts, R. (2000). World Checklist of Seed Plants Database in ACCESS D: 1-30141.

    Literature

    Flora of West Tropical Africa
    • —F.T.A. 2: 299.
    Flora Zambesiaca
    • Brenan in F.T.E.A., Legum-Caesalp.: 130 (1967).
    • in Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belg. 30(2): 110 (1957).
    • Léonard in Publ. I.N.E.A.C., Sér. Scient. 45: 90 (1950)
    • in Pharm. Journ. 14: 252 (1855).
    Flora of Tropical East Africa
    • in Mém. 8°, Classe Sci., Acad. Roy. Belg. 30(2): 110 (1957)
    • J. Léon., Etude Botanique des Copaliers du Congo Belge (Publ. I.N.E.A.C., Ser. Scient, 45): 90 (1950)
    • in Pharm. Journ. 14: 252 (1855)

    Sources

    Flora Zambesiaca
    Flora Zambesiaca
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0

    Flora of Tropical East Africa
    Flora of Tropical East Africa
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0

    Herbarium Catalogue Specimens
    'The Herbarium Catalogue, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet http://www.kew.org/herbcat [accessed on Day Month Year]'. Please enter the date on which you consulted the system.

    Kew Backbone Distributions
    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2018. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
    © Copyright 2017 World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

    Kew Names and Taxonomic Backbone
    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2018. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
    © Copyright 2017 International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

    Legumes of the World Online
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0