Skip to main content
  1. Family: Stemonuraceae Kårehed
    1. Genus: Medusanthera Seem.
      1. Medusanthera samoensis (Reinecke) R.A.Howard

        This species is accepted, and its native range is Samoa.

    [KBu]

    Utteridge, T.M.A. Kew Bull (2011) 66: 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-011-9266-z

    Type
    "Type: Samoa, Savai'i, ""Vaipouli-Busch"", Sept. 1894, Reinecke 72a (lectotype WRSL n.v., designated by Howard (1943b))."
    Habit
    Small tree 4 – 15 m
    Indumentum
    Indumentum of simple appressed hairs, translucent, colourless to pale yellow, 0.05 – 0.2 mm long
    Branches
    Branches 2.5 – 5 mm in diameter, densely hairy when young, soon sparsely hairy then glabrous, drying pale olive-green
    Leaves
    Leaves on fruiting plants as staminate except 10 – 26.5 × 5.5 – 11 cm, base rounded; petioles 2 – 2.6 cm Leaves on staminate plants: lamina chartaceous, elliptic to oblong, 6 – 15 (–19.5) × 4 – 8 cm, apex attenuate to very shortly acuminate, acumen 4 – 13 mm long, base obtuse-cuneate; ad- and abaxial lamina glabrous, lamina drying olive-green adaxially, pale yellow-green abaxially; midrib ± sulcate and glabrous adaxially, prominent and sparsely hairy or glabrous abaxially; secondary veins brochidodromus, not enclosed by secondary arches, 9 – 10 (– 12) pairs, glabrous, ± prominent ad- and abaxially; tertiary veins very weakly percurrent; petioles 1.1 – 2.2 cm long, densely hairy when young, soon glabrescent
    Flowers
    Staminate flowers pentamerous, calyx crateriform, 1 – 1.25 mm long, shallowly 5-lobed, glabrous; petals oblong, 4 – 6 × 1.5 – 1.9 mm, glabrous, pale green to white; stamens with anthers 0.9 – 1.6 mm long, filaments narrowly cylindrical, (1.5 –) 3 – 5.2 mm long, white and densely hairy with linear, pale purple, membranous hairs 1.25 – 2.5 mm long on the ad- and abaxial surface of the filaments immediately below the anthers (colours from Whistler 2004); pistillode 1.4 mm long Pistillate flowers not seen
    Inflorescences
    Pistillate inflorescences as staminate inflorescences except primary axis 3 – 3.5 cm long, branched to the 2nd order only Staminate inflorescences axillary, sometimes fasciculate with up to 3 inflorescences in each axil, umbellate with ultimate branches terminating in a cyme or irregular cyme, primary axis (12 –) 36 – 58 mm long, with 3 first order branches these dichotomously branching to the 3rd order, sparsely hairy; pedicels 2.5 – 3.5 mm long, hairs as the inflorescence branches
    Fruits
    Fruits oblong, apex rounded, base truncate, glabrous; when dry putamen flattened, not curved, narrowly oblong, 29.5 – 37.8 × 9 – 10.8 mm and 7 – 8.6 mm thick (measurements include only drupe as appendage is not significant when dry), putamen with a central ridge running the length of the convex side of the fruit, with 4 – 8 smaller ridges on either side, pulviniform appendage oblong, 14 – 20 × 4 – 7 mm covering the centre of the concave surface; when fresh drupe creamy white, pulviniform appendage fleshy, pale green maturing pink (colours from Whistler 2004).
    Distribution
    Endemic to the Samoan islands (American Samoa and Samoa).
    Ecology
    Lowland to cloud forest, more common at higher elevations (fide Whistler 2004); 60 – 1400 m.
    Conservation
    This species is only known from 12 localities throughout the Samoan islands. Whistler (2002) discusses the numerous threats to the native vegetation of the Samoan archipelago including both manmade and natural threats, especially population growth. Many of the collections are historical from lowland areas, and examining these localities using satellite imagery shows that these have now been converted to agricultural use (especially on Upolu), or are from forest areas adjacent to areas of habitat conversion. Using satellite imagery to measure the maximum AOO (c. 1,590 km2) in the islands by estimating cover of forest-type habitats (rather than urban and agricultural land) — rather than EOO (because of the sea being unsuitable habitat for the species) — together with the continuing loss of habitat on the islands and its distribution in only four locations, suggests a rating of Vulnerable (VU 2ab(ii,iii)).
    Vernacular
    Mātamō (Howard 1943a, b; Whistler 2004) and tofiga (Howard 1943a, b) have been reported as the Samoan names.
    Note
    This species is distinct because of the large leaves, especially on the female (fruiting) plants, which can be up to 26.5 cm long on petioles (usually 1 – 2.6 cm long) and especially the narrowly oblong drupe which is relatively large reaching up to nearly 4 cm long with a fleshy appendage which matures pink. The flowers and fruits, in vivo, are illustrated in Whistler (2004). There are no other Medusanthera species on Samoa but this species is similar to M. vitiensis, particularly with regard to the sexual dimorphism of the plants. M. samoensis differs from M. vitiensis in the leaf size, with both male and female plants having larger leaves (M. samoensis: leaves on female plants 10 – 26.5 cm long; M. vitiensis: 8 – 14.9 cm long), the longer petioles (M. samoensis: petioles on female plants 2 – 2.6 cm long; M. vitiensis: 0.9 – 1.9 cm long), and, especially in the drupe, which is narrowly oblong with a rounded apex (M. vitiensis drupe narrowly triangular with an attenuate apex); also note that the fleshy appendage in M. vitiensis has been recorded as maturing to a white colour.
    [KBu]
    Use
    """The wood is sometimes used for posts and house parts, but the plant is known by few people today"" (Whistler 2004)."

    Distribution

    Synonyms

    Other Data

    Medusanthera samoensis (Reinecke) R.A.Howard appears in other Kew resources:

    Bibliography

    First published in J. Arnold Arbor. 21: 469 (1940)

    Accepted by

    • Utteridge, T.M.A. (2011). A revision of the genus Medusanthera (Stemonuraceae, Icacinaceae s.l.) Kew Bulletin 66: 49-81. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
    • Banks, R.C. (ed.) (1982). Wildlife and wildlife habitat of American Samoa 2: 1-151. U.S. Fisch and Wildlife services, Washington.

    Literature

    Kew Bulletin

    • Utteridge, T. M. A.   & Schori, M. (2009). Stemonurus corrugatus (Stemonuraceae, Icacinaceae s.l.) a new species from Sarawak. Kew Bull. 64: 327 – 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Lekitoo, K., Matani, O. P. M., Remetwa, H. & Heatubun, C. D. (2008). Keanekaragaman Flora Taman Wisata Alam Gunung Meja — Papua Barat. BPK Manokwari, Manokwari.Google Scholar
    • Mace, G. M., Collar, N. J., Gaston, K. J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Akçakaya, H. R., Leader-Williams, N., Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Stuart, S. N. (2008). Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN’s System for Classifying Threatened Species. Conservation Biol. 22: 1424 – 1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Sgrillo, R. (2008). GE-Path: Make path for GoogleEarth Free. http://www.sgrillo.net/googleearth/gepath.htm (accessed 12/09/2009).
    • Moat, J. (2007). Conservation assessment tools extension for ArcView 3.x, version 1.2. GIS Unit, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/gis/cats.
    • Utteridge, T. M. A.  & Brummitt, R. K. (2007a). Icacinaceae. In: V. H. Heywood, R. K. Brummitt, A. Culham & O. Seberg (eds), Flowering Plant Families of the World, p. 173. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
    • Utteridge, T. M. A.  & Brummitt, R. K. (2007b). Stemonuraceae. In: V. H. Heywood, R. K. Brummitt, A. Culham & O. Seberg (eds), Flowering Plant Families of the World, pp. 310 – 311. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
    • Frazier, S. (2006). Threats to Biodiversity. In: A. J. Marshall & B. M. Beehler (eds), The Ecology of Papua, pp. 1199 – 1229. Periplus Editions, Singapore.Google Scholar
    • Soh, M. C. K., Sodhi, N. S. & Lim, S. L. H. (2006). High sensitivity of montane bird communities to habitat disturbance in Peninsular Malaysia. Biol. Conservation 129: 149 – 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Faridah-Hanum, I., Khamis, S. & Hamzah, K. A. (2005). A handbook on the Peat Swamp Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. Peat Swamp Forest Project, UNDP/GEF Funded. FRIM, Kepong.Google Scholar
    • Utteridge, T. M. A.  , Nagamasu, H., Teo, S. P., White, L. C. & Gasson, P. (2005). Sleumeria (Icacinaceae): A new genus from northern Borneo. Syst. Bot. 30: 635 – 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Cooper, W. (2004). Fruits of the Australian Tropical Rainforest. Nokomis Editions, Melbourne.Google Scholar
    • Warnemont, J. A. & Wood, C. E. (2004). Richard A. Howard (1917 – 2003): A bibliography of his published works. Harvard Pap. Bot. 9: 239 – 253.Google Scholar
    • Whistler (2004: 85);
    • Whistler, W. A. (2004). Rainforest trees of Samoa: A guide to the common lowland and foothill forest trees of the Samoan Archipelago. Isle Botanica, Honolulu.Google Scholar
    • Rodriguez, J. H. (2003). Richard Alden Howard (1917 – 2003). Taxon 52(4): 871 – 872.Google Scholar
    • Willis, F., Moat, J. & Paton, A. (2003). Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodiversity Conserv. 12: 1537 – 1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Stibig, H.-J., Beuchle, R. & Janvier, P. (2002). Forest cover map of Insular Southeast Asia at 1: 5,50000. TREES Publications Series D. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy.Google Scholar
    • Whistler, W. A. (2002). The Samoan rainforest: A guide to the vegetation of the Samoan Archipelago. Isle Botanica, Honolulu.Google Scholar
    • IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
    • Kårehed, J. (2001). Multiple origin of the tropical forest tree family Icacinaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 2259 – 2274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Loucks, C. (2001). Borneo lowland rain forests (IM0102). WWF Ecoregions. http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/im/im0102_full.html (accessed 09/02/2009).
    • Utteridge, T. M. A. (2001). A new species of Medusanthera Seem. (Icacinaceae) from New Guinea: Medusanthera inaequalis Utteridge. Contributions to the Flora of Mt Jaya IV. Kew Bull. 56: 233 – 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Wikramanayake, E., Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C., Olson, D., Morrison, J., Lamoreux, J., McKnight, M. & Hedao, P. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: a Conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
    • Savolainen, V., Chase, M. W., Hoot, S. B., Morton, C. M., Soltis, D. E., Bayer, C., Fay, M. F., de Bruijn, A. Y., Sullivan, S. & Qiu, Y.-L. (2000). Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306 – 362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Soltis D. E., Soltis, P. S., Chase, M. W., Mort, M. E., Albach, D. C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W. H., Hoot, S. B., Fay, M. F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S. M., Prince, L. M., Kress, W. J., Nixon, K. C. & Farris, J. S. (2000). Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381 – 461.Google Scholar
    • Holmgren, P. K. & Holmgren, N. H. (1998 [continuously updated]). Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
    • Turner, I. M. (1995). A catalogue of the vascular plants of Malaya. Gard. Bull. Singapore 47: 1 – 757.Google Scholar
    • Aiken, S. R. & Leigh, C. H. (1992). Vanishing rain forests: the ecological transition in Malaysia. (Oxford Biogeography Series; 5). Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
    • Smith, A. C. (1985). Flora Vitiensis Nova. Vol. 3. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Kauai.Google Scholar
    • LeCroy, M., Kulupi, A. & Peckover, W. S. (1980). Goldie's Bird of Paradise: Display, natural history and traditional relationships of people to the bird. Wilson Bull. 92: 289 – 301.Google Scholar
    • Hickey, L. J. (1979). A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. In: C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (eds), Anatomy of the dicotyledons, pp. 25 – 39. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
    • Kochummen, K. M. (1978). Icacinaceae. In: F. S. P. Ng (ed.), Tree Flora of Malaya Vol. 3: 108 – 118. Longman, London.Google Scholar
    • Hallé, F. (1974). Architecture of trees in the rain forest of Morobe District, New Guinea. Biotropica 6: 43 – 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Sleumer, H.  (1971). Icacinaceae. Fl. Males., Ser. I, Spermat. 7: 1 – 87. Noordhoff, Leiden.Google Scholar
    • Sleumer, H.  (1969). Materials towards the knowledge of the Icacinaceae of Asia, Malesia, and adjacent areas. Blumea 17: 181 – 264.Google Scholar
    • Systematics Association Committee (1962). Terminology of simple symmetrical plane shapes (chart 1). Taxon 11: 145 – 156 & 245 – 247.Google Scholar
    • van Steenis-Kruseman, M. J. (1950). Malaysian plant collectors and collections. Fl. Males. Ser. I, Spermat. 1: 1 – 639.Google Scholar
    • Howard, R. A.  (1943a). Studies of the Icacinaceae — VI. Irvingbaileya and Codiocarpus, two new genera of the Icacinaceae. Brittonia 5: 47 – 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Howard, R. A.  (1943b). Studies of the Icacinaceae. VII. A revision of the genus Medusanthera Seeman. Lloydia 6: 133 – 143.Google Scholar
    • Sleumer, H.  (1942). Icacinaceae. In: A. Engler (ed.) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edition, Volume 20b, pp. 322 – 396. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
    • Bailey, I. W. & Howard, R. A. (1941a). The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. I. Anatomy of the node and internode. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 125 – 132.Google Scholar
    • Bailey, I. W. & Howard, R. A. (1941b). The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. II. Vessels. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 171 – 187.Google Scholar
    • Bailey, I. W. & Howard, R. A. (1941c). The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. III. Imperforate tracheary elements and xylem parenchyma. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 432 – 442.Google Scholar
    • Bailey, I. W. & Howard, R. A. (1941d). The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae. IV. Rays of the secondary xylem. J. Arnold Arbor. 22: 556 – 568.Google Scholar
    • Sleumer, H. (1941). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Icacinaceen und Peripterygiaceen II. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 15: 359 – 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Howard, R. A. (1940). Studies of the Icacinaceae, I. Preliminary taxonomic notes. J. Arnold Arbor. 21: 461 – 489.Google Scholar
    • Sleumer, H. (1940). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Icacinaceen und Peripterygiaceen. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 15: 228 – 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Lloyd & Aiken (1934: 64).
    • Lloyd, C. & Aiken, W. H. (1934). Flora of Samoa. Bull. Lloyd Libr. Bot. 4: 1 – 113.Google Scholar
    • Merrill, E. D.  (1933) [printed 1934]. New Sumatran plants. I. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. 19: 149 – 203.Google Scholar
    • Ridley, H. N. (1922). The Flora of the Malay Peninsula. Vol. I — Polypetalae. L. Reeve & Co., London.Google Scholar
    • Merrill, E. D. (1920). New or noteworthy Philippine Plants, XVI. Philipp. J. Sci. 17: 239 – 323.Google Scholar
    • White, C. T. (1918). Contributions to the Queensland Flora. Bot. Bull. Dept. Agric., Queensland 20: 5 – 20.Google Scholar
    • Tylecarpus samoensis Reinecke (1898: 650, tab. XIIIA);
    • Reinecke, F. (1898). Die Flora der Samoa-Inseln. II. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 25: 578 – 708.Google Scholar
    • King, G. (1895). Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula, No. 7. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, Pt. 2, Nat. Hist. 64: 16 – 137.Google Scholar
    • Engler, A. (1893). Icacinaceae. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds), Die natürlichen Pflazenfamilien III (5), pp. 233 – 257. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
    • Valeton, T. (1886). Critisch Overzicht der Olacineae. P. Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar
    • Rolfe, R. A. (1885). Supplementary list of Philippine Plants. J. Bot. 23: 209 – 216.Google Scholar
    • Beccari, O. (1877). Studio monografico sopra le piante della famiglia delle Icacineae e delle Menispermaceae sin qui scoperte nella Malesia e nella Nuova Guinea. Malesia 1: 105 – 165.Google Scholar
    • Mueller, F. (1867). Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae, Volume 6. Auctoritate Guberni, Coloniae Victoriae, Melbourne.Google Scholar
    • Seemann, B.  (1865 – 1873). Flora Vitiensis. L. Reeve & Co., London.Google Scholar
    • Seemann, B. (1864). New South Sea Island plants. J. Bot. 2: 70 – 77.Google Scholar
    • Merrill, E. D.  (1862). Contributions to Botany, Volume 1. Williams & Norgate, London.Google Scholar
    • Miers, J. (1852). On some genera of the Icacinaceae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, 10: 108 – 119.Google Scholar
    • R. A. Howard (1940: 469, 1943b: 141);

    Kew Backbone Distributions

    • Utteridge, T.M.A. (2011). A revision of the genus Medusanthera (Stemonuraceae, Icacinaceae s.l.) Kew Bulletin 66: 49-81. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Sources

    Kew Backbone Distributions
    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2020. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
    © Copyright 2017 World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

    Kew Bulletin
    Kew Bulletin
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0

    Kew Names and Taxonomic Backbone
    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2020. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
    © Copyright 2017 International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0